Garage Shop Tools

SureFire E2D LED Defender Flashlight Max-120 Lumens E2DL-BK specifications:

SureFire E2D LED Defender Flashlight Max-200 Lumens E2DL-BK Description:
Compact pocket sized, dual output LED flashlight intended for self defense and personal protection. The E2D LED Defender features a solid state, two stage light emitting diode that generates six times the output of a common two D cell flashlight at its high setting and five lumens of useful light enough to read a map or negotiate a black path on low. And should 200 lumens of blinding light not be enough to convince an aggressor to back off, the E2DL’s crenellated Strike Bezel and scalloped tailcap supply two sets of hard anodized aluminum “teeth” as a last line of defense. Two useful output levels, a long runtime, a hard anodized lasting outside, compact size, and improved personal protection potential make this flashlight a great everyday carry choice. Particularly for those looking for a self defense light with a bit more of a bite.

SureFire E2D LED Defender Flashlight Max-200 Lumens E2DL-BK Reviews:

&nbsp,

36 of 37 people found the following review helpful:

5.0 out of five stars
Terrific Light, as common, from Surefire,
January 14, 2009

By&nbsp,Chad Beck Brooklyn, NY United States See all my reviews
REAL NAME
&nbsp,&nbsp,

If you’re new to high powered flashlights, Surefire is the benchmark. This ain’t no Maglite. Made in USA, lifetime warranty with unbelievable buyer service, unequaled build quality, and state of the art LED’s. This light has two beams. One click gives you a focused beam with amazing power 120 Lumens. Click again and the lower powered beam is still plenty strong and will most likely be what you use more frequently. I really recommend the dual stage variant of this model. It is great to have a high powered beam when you need it, but walking the dog or searching for something in a tent does not need 120 lumens five is good. Battery life is great.

If spending this much money on a flashlight looks absurd, there are other alternatives at your disposal that are just as strong, but are made in China and do not come with the same warranty. These are Fenix I bought a P30D on for 65 dollars for a friend. That Fenix light does not have the same build quality as my Surefires, but has a alike beam and I could rate light output someplace between my L5 100 Lumen and this E2DL 120 Lumen. I could go with Surefire any day for the peace of mind that if I drop it in a river, it is going to work just good waterproof to “33 feet” at least, and the knowledge that it was made in the States.

Also, beware of LUMEN hype. Other manufacturers like Fenix make claims about light output that I have found to be around double of what Surefire rates. So a 220 lumen Fenix P30D looks to my eye to be around a 110 lumen Surefire. I did not test scientifically but I trust my eyes and it was certainly weaker than this 120 Lumen E2DL. Surefire is very conservative about their claims, which is in line with their stellar repute. As well, be sure whatever flashlight you are purchasing comes with the new LED’s, as technology is changing quickly and an updated light may have considerably better battery life than last LED models. Call or e mail Surefire and ask they’ll be straight with you. As of January ‘09, this specific light has the new CREE LED and is certainly state of the art. Also sorry Amazon, but Batteryjunction.Com ships Surefires free of charge with a bunch of free extra batteries. Enjoy!

&nbsp,

13 of 14 people found the following review helpful:

5.0 out of five stars
Awesome LED illumination,
January 8, 2009

By&nbsp,Erik S. Minneapolis, MN See all my reviews

This became my second Surefire flashlight in 13 years. Ironically, Surefire looks to make such a reliable, lasting, and designed part of equipment that I can’t be the recurrent buyer I should be. Previous to this I owned a 9N flashlight, but the bulb assembly broke and can’t be replaced.

Enter the E2D LED.

I was 1st impressed with the smallness of this flashlight. It fits nicely into my hand, and equally so in a pocket. It feels light. The double tap activation switch works well, and I believe it to be a great bit of practical design. I don’t miss the “twist” kind of activation switch from my last Surefire. Switching from High to Low power on the E2D LED does take some practice, but once you get your timing down, it is not a consideration.

The full power light of this light is awe inspiring. I still feel nearly blinded when firstly firing this light up. I on occasion squint to overcome it. Seriously. The lower lumen setting is more than adequate for most night work, but I can see the effect of shining the full power light into someone’s eyes. The light cast by this flashlight is smooth, , and far reaching.

The ruggedness of the flashlight is good. The lens is protected and tough, and the light has still to fail caused by mechanical defect. I have had it for about six months now, and it became an nearly daily use tool. Incidentally, I’m still on the 1st set of batteries.

My only gripe with the flashlight is that the tail cap prevents “flat thumbing” the activation switch. It is hard to describe, but you must nearly reach your thumb over the rear cap wall, and point inwards ever so somewhat to activate the switch. For momentary activation it is no problem, but to click the light on permanently takes many finesse. This is by no means a problem in general, but I figure I have to find many faults, right?

In the end, this flashlight is well worth the initial high cost. If it lasts the 13 years that my 9N did, I’ll think about the cost to be a steal, really. The powerful light of the flashlight, the ergonomic feel, and the fact that it has an very technical almost Star Wars like look makes this the best flashlight I have owned.

This is one mean part of equipment, and will surely last through many high abuse.

&nbsp,

Eleven of 13 people found the following review helpful:

5.0 out of five stars
A great carry light!,
October 12, 2008

By&nbsp,Pipper DFW, TX United States See all my reviews

I have some number of Surefire flashlights as well as the incandescent E2D Defender, the U2 super, G3 and M6. This new LED model is only a little bigger than the incandescent variant, but it is twice as bright, and it has a low power setting, too. It has great throw and a nice spill beam. This will be my carry light of choice.

Related Posts fog away suction spectacular savings and reviews.

Related SureFire E2D LED Products:

15 Responses to “surefire e2d led”

1. Stephanie L. Says:
   May 1, 2009 at 8:56 pm

   Who is the cheapest online dealer?

2. Mitzi Says:
   May 2, 2009 at 2:57 pm

   Clearance prices aren’t much more discounted than this so may as well buy it now.

3. Anne B. Says:
   May 3, 2009 at 10:28 pm

   It’s one of the better exterior accessories out there. Good Pricing.

4. Brandon B Says:
   May 4, 2009 at 8:10 pm

   I am looking to buy one in Los Angeles so i dont pay for shipping if it’s not free

5. Brian74 Says:
   May 5, 2009 at 2:22 pm

   Is that the lowest price for surefire e2d led online, or all deals included?

6. Marilyn J. Says:
   May 6, 2009 at 3:55 pm

   Usually price of surefire e2d is cheap for exterior accessories

7. Brian76 Says:
   May 7, 2009 at 6:27 pm

   How long is the warranty?

8. Lillian L. Says:
   May 8, 2009 at 9:30 pm

   Check out my site if you need an accessory or a coupon

9. Maria G. Says:
   May 9, 2009 at 7:30 pm

   Where can you get it used online?

10. Norma T. Says:
    May 10, 2009 at 11:21 pm

    I have one for sale, great price, email me if interested

11. Dixie Says:
    May 11, 2009 at 2:19 pm

    Usually has a limited availability, and when i found it, wasnt exactly the cheapest

12. Jason77 Says:
    May 12, 2009 at 5:16 pm

    Not a bad price and usually you can find it discounted in outlet stores.

13. Lois Z. Says:
    May 13, 2009 at 0:30 pm

    Don’t think closeout prices are a deal, i would buy it now.

14. Michelle W. Says:
    May 14, 2009 at 0:53 pm

    Is online price generally better than store price?

15. Barbara O. Says:
    May 15, 2009 at 10:52 pm

    I have one on sale, best price, email me if interested

Red Line 60103 SI-1 Fuel System Cleaner 15 oz. specifications:

Red Line 60103 SI-1 Fuel System Cleaner – 15 oz. Description:
SI 1 injector and valve detergent is a concentrated package of the most powerful high temperature detergents available to clean gasoline fuel injectors or carburetors, intake valves and combustion chambers and can clean injectors to almost 100 efficiency in one treatment. The cleansing effect on injector deposits can increase fuel economy roughly twelve or greater, based on the condition of the injectors.

Red Line 60103 SI-1 Fuel System Cleaner – 15 oz. Reviews:

&nbsp,

Eleven of twelve people found the following review helpful:

5.0 out of five stars
Best and most cost effective product of its type,
July 5, 2009

By&nbsp,Glenn Carpenter Golden, Colorado See all my reviews
REAL NAME
&nbsp,&nbsp,

Short version:

Among all fuel system cleaners I am aware of, Redline SI 1 holds the highest quantity per dollar based on maker MSDS of the important fuel system cleaning compounds called polyether amines PEA. Mainly for this reason I believe SI 1 to be the best available and most cost effective fuel system cleaner product at retail pricing. ..

In my case it hasn’t been needed to use Redline’s suggested quantity of roughly three oz per fill up. The effects of one oz per fill up are indistinguishable by tested results see my base for this declaration below. This results in an estimated cost of $0.35/tank or less than a 10th of a penny per mile. A full case at this handling rate is enough to treat 180 full tanks of fuel or to last roughly 80,000 miles. Figures established 15gal/tank, 25 35mpg.

Long version:

As far as I know, every efficient fuel system cleaner on the market uses a class of compounds called polyether amines PEA, in varying proportions, to effectively clean deposits from fuel system parts, and especially from fuel injectors, which can quickly affect engine efficiency and performance when not operating properly. My understanding is that these compounds were 1st developed by Chevron and sold under the Techron name, and have since been made available to other blenders of fuel treatment merchandise. Till newly BG 44K, Chevron Techron Concentrate, Gumout Regane Fuel System Cleaner, Amsoil P.I. Performance Improver Concentrate, and Redline SI 1 among others listed polyether amines on their Material Safety Data Sheets MSDS in proportions varying from roughly 25 to 50. Most of these merchandise not list PEA on their MSDS, having changed their terminology to disguise the exact nature of their products’ constituent parts. If PEA is still contained in those merchandise is a matter of doubt. As of this writing Redline’s SI 1 MSDS still specifies that the product holds 30 50 PEA. Consequently it’s one of the not many left over fuel system cleaner merchandise that undoubtedly does contain PEA in important quantity.

I have been able to test the effectiveness of fuel system cleaners in one of my own vehicles using a technique I stumbled on after having its injectors professionally cleaned while out of the car. The car in question uses a Bosch engine management system that reports fuel injector data to an on board computer, which then uses that data to compute and report instant and average mpg to the driver. I noted after the professional cleaning that the accuracy of the stated mpg, when used to measure average mpg over each full tank of fuel, improved from a previous error of around 3 5 that is, the stated mpg was 3 5 below the real mpg, or usually just over 1mpg low to an error as close to zero as I could measure that is, typically between 1 and 1, fluctuating above and below a perfect “match”. This may be clarified on the base that the engine management system will reimburse for a dirty injector by holding the injectors open somewhat longer throughout each combustion cycle, to admit the correct total of fuel. The on board computer interprets that as a somewhat higher rate of fuel intake, reporting a lower than actual mpg figure.

After some number of thousand miles not long the perfect mpg accuracy I’d noticed started to deteriorate, probably showing that the cleaned injectors beginned to suffer from many sort of renewed blockage to fuel flow. Out of a want to keep near perfect injector performance, and also out of curiosity, I started experimenting with different commercially available fuel system cleaners and keeping records of the results at each fill up.

Leaving out the long details, I will simply say here that the results were amazingly clear and unambiguous. Every time I went some number of tanks without using a fuel system cleaner usually consequently of simply forgetting to use it or not taking the trouble, the on board computer OBC accuracy could deteriorate. This could change from tank to tank, of course, consequently of inevitable measurement errors, but the trend was clear over a few fill ups. Returning to the use of a fuel system cleaner Chevron Techron Concentrate, Gumout Regane or SI 1, all of which at the time did contain PEA, the accuracy could improve again quickly inside 2 3 fill ups. I began using the SI 1 entirely seven months ago depending on its obvious cost effectiveness and since then I reduced the quantity I use in each tank to the current 1oz per 15gal fill up. The results remain unambiguous. If I use this small total of SI 1 steadily, the accuracy of the on board computer is excellent, with an average error of below 1, or a small percentage the error rate seen when not using such a product.

Based on the above I feel I can confidently complete that SI 1 works well, at reduced treatment rates, at keeping fuel injectors clean. Fuel system types and injectors will differ, and other parts of the fuel system as an example intake valves and combustion chambers may gain from higher treatment rates or, conceivably, may not benefit at all. Real engine efficiency won’t differ almost as much as injector hygiene, since the engine feedback system usually corrects for imperfect injector flow rates. But, as the flow is more largely impeded, or impeded differentially among the individual injectors, mpg will be influenced to many degree. I feel it’s well worth the tiny cost to steadily use a small quantity of SI 1. Other benefits, like to combustion efficiency consequently of combustion chamber hygiene, to volumetric efficiency consequently of intake valve hygiene, and to fuel system lubrication, most likely exist also though I can’t evaluate them and haven’t attempted to do so. Other fuel system cleaners may work as effectively, or almost as effectively, but I don’t believe them to be as good by value per dollar spent.

In my experimentation I did attempt many less costly fuel system cleaners, those not containing PEA. They appeared to dont have effect. I can’t categorically state that only PEA containing fuel system cleaners work, of course, but my observations did match the regular wisdom on this point. I also experimented with using top tier fuels only, without any extra fuel system cleaners. The results were the same as when using non detergent Costco and others fuels. I do not doubt that top tier fuels contain small amounts of cleaners and will keep a fuel system functionally and acceptably clean, but the amounts involved are reputed to be tiny and my observations seem to point to that a small total of extra additive is far more efficient.

&nbsp,

Three of three people found the following review helpful:

5.0 out of five stars
I Trust It,
September 25, 2008

By&nbsp,voiceoverthewall.Com United States See all my reviews

&nbsp,&nbsp,

Verified PurchaseWhat’s this?